 |
 -0 |
 |
|
||||||||
 |
||||||||
 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
State Weighs a Tax Hike The plan, parts of which were shared privately with major Wall Street firms last month, is modeled after the one that kept New York City solvent in the 1970s. It would pay off much of California's current deficit this year, then repay that loan over several years. By creating a separate entity to raise those taxes and issue those bonds — which the administration estimates will amount to at least $8.2 billion — officials hope to demonstrate that the money should not be subject to Proposition 98, which requires that a percentage of all general-fund revenue be spent on education. This money would be kept entirely separate from the general fund and would only be used to pay off California's budget deficit for this fiscal year. The plan, which was drafted by the state Finance Department but which aides said Davis himself has not approved, faces political and financial uncertainties. Some legislators are hesitant about borrowing to pay off the deficit, which they say would in effect delay the state's reckoning with its budget problems. Others are wary of any tax increase, including one that would be used to pay off new debt. Still, legislators and others have acknowledged in recent weeks that dramatic moves are necessary to close the state's budget gap, which already has forced cutbacks in medical services and education, and tuition hikes at state colleges and universities. In addition, officials are contemplating even deeper service cuts as they turn to next year's budget, which the Legislature is supposed to adopt by mid-June. Approval of the latest proposal would require a two-thirds majority in both houses of the state Legislature, where Democrats hold most — but not two-thirds — of the seats. Letters sent by the investment banking firms show they reacted favorably to the proposal but also warned that trying to borrow the money to pay off all or part of the deficit without raising such a new tax or making severe cuts could prove disastrous. The firms said that if the state does not soon reach a solution that closes the budget gap next year and balances revenues and spending, it risks running out of cash and losing its ability to borrow altogether. "Without a timely solution, the state's credibility will suffer, and it will be very difficult to find anyone willing to make loans of size to the state," warned a letter from Lehman Bros. It was one of several sent by major banks at the request of state finance officials seeking comment on potential budget solutions. The Lehman Bros. letter went on to say a "worst-case scenario would find the state out of cash and out of cost-effective options within 12 months or sooner." David Takashima, the Davis administration's chief deputy finance director, said the plan was worked out over two months in response to Republican proposals to borrow billions of dollars but not to authorize a tax hike for repaying those loans. Takashima said no decision has been made about whether the plan will be included in the revised budget that Davis is scheduled to release next week. Although most Democrats say the letters are further evidence that any reasonable solution to the crisis must include a tax increase, many Republicans are vowing not to be bullied by financial firms looking to boost profits for their shareholders. GOP Warning |
|
|
